For anyone wishing to bury secrets, especially of the unsavoury sort, there is one forum that stands out.
Call it a higher education institution. Call it a university. Even better, capitalise it: the University.
This is certainly the case in Australia, where education is less a pursuit of knowledge as the acquiring of a commodity, laid out spam for so much return. On that vast island continent, the university, dominated by a largely semi-literate and utterly unaccountable management, is a place where secrets are buried, concealed with a gleeful dedication verging on mania.
In its submission to what will hopefully become the Australian Universities Accord, the Australian Association of University Professors (AAUP) notes the following:
AUKUS turns Australian universities into a political weapon
Universities have become targets for tomorrow's defence personnel in a move brought on by the AUKUS pact and fear of China.
Those in the defence industry have taken note. By turning such institutions of instruction into supply lines for research and development in armaments, they can be assured of secrecy conditions the envy of most intelligence agencies. Consulting, viewing and gaining access to relevant agreements, documentation and projects for reasons of public discussion is virtually impossible. These are always seen as "commercial" and "in confidence".
Only the overly fed and watered members of the University Politburo are granted such access. Entry into the arcana of its deliberations is ceremonially tolerated via academic board meetings or senatorial deliberations. Furthermore, academics throughout the university sport a reliable, moral flabbiness that will prevent them from spilling the beans and airing a troubled conscience, even in cases where leaking the documentation might be possible. Middle-class, mortgage-laden status anxiety is the usual formula here, one that neuters revolutionary spirits - not that there was much to begin with.
Across Australia's universities, the AUKUS military initiative between the U.S., UK and Australia, primarily focused on developing nuclear-powered technology for a new submarine design, has titillated the managerial wonks of the tertiary education sector. In September, the Defence Department announced that 4,000 additional Commonwealth-supported places (CSPs) for undergraduate students would be funded as part of its "Nuclear-Powered Submarine Student Pathways" strategy.
Institutes have sprung up running short courses to rake in the cash, such as the UWA Defence and Security Institute, which proudly claims to have created the 'essential course for those seeking to gain a greater understanding of AUKUS Pillar 1 (nuclear-powered submarines) and the impacts for Western Australia and beyond'. A course running for 13 hours does not seem particularly hefty, but this is a field of glitz over substance.
Then come the true villains of the piece, the arms manufacturers and companies that make the military-university-industrial complex intimate and obscene. One of interest here is Israel's Elbit Systems. For years, it has hammered out a reputation for manufacturing such lethal products as the Hermes 900 drone, which was first deployed in 2014 against targets in the Gaza Strip. It supplies the lion's share of drones used by the Israeli Defence Forces for strikes and surveillance (the figure may be as high as 85 per cent).
AUKUS deal shows Australia's subservience to U.S. dictates
There is great community opposition to the Labor Government's embrace of AUKUS and its proposed spend of $368 billion on acquiring nuclear-powered submarines.
The company has managed to beef up many an activist's resume. Members of the Palestine Action group claim to have scored a victory in securing the permanent closure of two of Elbit's sites in 2022, including the London head office.
The organisation trumpeted in August this year:
The corporation has also fallen out of favour with a number of investors. HSBC and the French multinational AXA Investment Managers divested from the company in 2018 and 2019 given its role in producing and commercialising cluster munitions and white phosphorus shells. In May 2022, the Australian sovereign wealth fund, Future Fund, excluded Elbit Systems Limited from its investment portfolio for much the same reasons.
Despite this blotched and blotted record, Elbit could still stealthily establish a bridgehead in the university sector down under through its creation, in 2021, of a Centre of Excellence in Human-Machine Teaming and Artificial Intelligence in Port Melbourne. Elbit Systems of Australia (ELSA) had two special clients: the State Government of Victoria, which provided some funding via Invest Victoria, and RMIT University's Centre for Industrial AI Research and Innovation.
The two-year partnership with ELSA's Centre of Excellence was intended to, according to ELSA's then managing director and retired Major General Paul McLachlan:
$368 billion leagues under the sea: The Opportunity Cost of staying afloat
The subject of this story is Opportunity Cost, which is an economics term that refers to the choices you didn't make.
Despite such seemingly noble goals, the opening ceremony in February 2021 had a distinctly heavy military accent, with senior representatives from the Royal Australian Airforce, DST (Defence Science and Technology) Group and the Capability Acquisition and Sustainment Group (CASG). No one present could deny that technology used in the context of civilian evacuations in the face of natural disaster could just as well be deployed in a military security context.
As journalist and author Antony Loewenstein has observed:
Since the Hamas attacks on Israeli soil that took place on 7 October, the ELSA-RMIT-Victorian relationship has seemingly altered. A war of horrendous carnage is being waged in the Gaza Strip. Activists claim to have scored a famous victory in securing the university's hazy termination of any partnership with ELSA.
Hilmi Dabbagh, of BDS Australia, claims:
Such confidence is admirably fresh, if a touch green. It is worth looking at the university statement, which is revealing in ways that have been entirely missed in the enthusiastic pronouncements of the BDS movement.
The university claims to:
Such wording avoids the language of termination, leaving the question open as to whether it ever had an arrangement to begin with, with its requisite project links. This will, as with much else, be deemed commercial, in confidence and buried in the bowels of secrecy we have come to expect from the antipodean university sector.
Dr Binoy Kampmark is a Cambridge Scholar and lecturer at RMIT University. You can follow Dr Kampmark on Twitter @BKampmark.
Related Articles
26
℃
